Well, there's an article coming out in the next issue of the Financial Analyst Journal that takes a deep dive. So anyone who's got access to the FAJ, take a look. For the moment, you can also find it on SSRN. Just look up R-not fundamental growth and it'll take you right there. Anyway, if you wanted a growth index that didn't anchor on expensive stocks, but anchored on fast-growing companies, how would you instinctively choose to measure that growth? Sales, profits, those are the obvious choices. Slightly less obvious, most growth companies have R&D, and it's a big enough part of their business that they break it out as a separate item in their P&L. So what about growth in P&L? Excuse me, growth in R&D. Because if they're shrinking their R&D budget, that's a bad sign. And so if you have three different growth rates, growth in sales, growth in profits, and growth in R&D spending, if that's available, two of the three if it's not, you average those growth rates and you've got a very good gauge of how fast the company is growing. If it's growing rapidly enough to be in the top 25%, let's use it. Here's a fun factoid. Two of the magnificent seven don't make the cut for the RAFI growth index. Really? Which two? Take a guess.